NOT REAL NEWS: A have a look at what did not occur this week

A roundup of a few of the hottest however utterly unfaithful tales and visuals of the week. None of those are legit, though they had been shared extensively on social media. The Related Press checked them out. Listed below are the information:


COVID vaccines don’t kill extra individuals than rifles

CLAIM: Rifles prompted 454 deaths in the USA in 2020, whereas COVID-19 vaccines prompted 20,622 deaths in the USA in 2021.

THE FACTS: The declare that 20,000 individuals have died from COVID-19 vaccines misrepresents knowledge maintained by the Facilities for Illness Management and Prevention and the Meals and Drug Administration. Up to now, a complete of 9 deaths within the U.S. have been linked to the photographs. Because the nation reels from a spate of mass shootings which have sparked requires gun reform, social media customers are distorting knowledge to falsely declare that COVID-19 vaccines kill individuals extra usually than rifles do. The publish makes use of a graphic that compares rifle loss of life numbers to purported COVID-19 vaccine loss of life numbers. The textual content claims that rifles killed 454 individuals within the U.S. in 2020 whereas COVID-19 vaccines killed 20,622 individuals within the U.S. in 2021. The publish implies that vaccines trigger extra deaths than rifles do, however a more in-depth have a look at the info reveals that’s false. The CDC knowledge it cites comes from the Vaccine Antagonistic Occasion Reporting System, or VAERS, an early warning system run by the CDC and the FDA that’s meant as a portal to share potential antagonistic occasions after vaccines, not a verified database of vaccine-related deaths. VAERS makes use of passive surveillance, which means individuals self-report any detrimental medical occasion they skilled after getting vaccinated. Anybody can submit a report on any attainable response after the vaccine and anybody can entry the database. Well being care suppliers and producers are required to submit antagonistic responses reported after vaccines, even when they don’t know whether or not the vaccine prompted them. The VAERS web site explains that its knowledge might embody “info that’s incomplete, inaccurate, coincidental, or unverifiable.” VAERS states that submissions or the variety of experiences within the system can’t be interpreted as causal proof of an affiliation between a vaccine and an antagonistic occasion. When critical occasions are reported in VAERS, officers comply with up with the particular person reporting the occasion to acquire extra info and medical information. Up to now, the CDC has recognized 9 deaths related to uncommon blood clots that had been brought on by the Johnson & Johnson/Janssen vaccine. At present, 221.5 million individuals within the U.S. are totally vaccinated. The rifle loss of life knowledge was taken from the FBI’s annual Crime in the USA report in 2020. In line with a desk displaying homicide circumstances by weapon, at the very least 454 homicides within the U.S. in 2020 concerned rifles. Nevertheless, that dataset additionally exhibits that almost 5,000 extra murders concerned weapons that weren’t categorized by sort. It’s attainable a few of these concerned rifles. The desk lists 13,620 whole 2020 gun deaths, when all forms of firearms are counted. The FBI’s Crime in the USA report can also be restricted as a result of it doesn’t embody knowledge from each legislation enforcement company within the nation. Participation within the FBI’s Uniform Crime Reporting program, which makes up the report, is voluntary.

— Related Press author Ali Swenson in New York contributed this report.


Posts distort knowledge on Pfizer COVID-19 vaccine and being pregnant

CLAIM: A Pfizer doc reveals that 82%-97% of pregnant ladies who obtained the corporate’s COVID-19 vaccine “misplaced their infants.”

THE FACTS: The flawed calculation misrepresents a slim subset of knowledge from a Pfizer database of antagonistic occasions recorded throughout the first two months of the vaccine rollout. Some social media customers shared screenshots of headlines from pro-life blogs that made the false declare. “Stunning Pfizer Doc Reveals 82% of Vaccinated Pregnant Girls Suffered Miscarriages,” learn one. “Court docket Ordered Launch Of Pfizer Doc Reveals 82% – 97% Of Vaccinated Pregnant Girls Misplaced Their Infants,” mentioned one other. The weblog posts, written by the identical creator and shared on a number of websites, make the deceptive calculation primarily based on an April 2021 doc {that a} group referred to as Public Well being and Medical Professionals for Transparency says Pfizer submitted to the FDA and launched to them by a Freedom of Info Act request. The FDA has not responded to a number of requests for remark. The doc compiled antagonistic occasion experiences from Dec. 1, 2020, by Feb. 28, 2021, throughout 63 nations. Anybody may report back to the registry, and it contained experiences submitted on to Pfizer, these reported by federal well being authorities, circumstances revealed in medical literature and scientific research. The info described 270 reported vaccinated pregnancies. No end result was recorded for 238 of these pregnancies. Particulars on antagonistic occasions or different outcomes had been recorded for 34 pregnancies. Of this group, 28 ladies reported both the lack of a fetus or a neonatal loss of life. 5 others reported “end result pending,” and one reported “regular end result.” To provide you with its excessive percentages, the weblog divided the 28 circumstances of fetal or neonatal loss by the 34 circumstances that listed outcomes. This yielded the 82% determine. Then, the weblog factored in a calculation that assumed with out proof that the 5 pending circumstances additionally resulted in fetal losses, which might carry the full losses to 33. Thirty-three was then divided by 34 to yield 97%. “This takes knowledge from the Pfizer doc utterly out of context,” mentioned Dr. Laura Morris, co-chair of the College of Missouri well being care system’s COVID-19 and influenza vaccine committee. The doc doesn’t give the full variety of vaccinated pregnant ladies, so the general charge of particular antagonistic occasions can’t be decided, she mentioned. Consultants say the net posts’ interpretations paint a false image of the vaccine’s results, and fail to account for necessary elements, together with affected person reporting bias, which displays that ladies who’ve skilled an antagonistic being pregnant occasion could be extra prone to report back to the registry, no matter whether or not or not the vaccine was linked to the occasion. “Now we have no proof that the vaccine in any manner would interrupt a being pregnant or trigger this,” mentioned Dr. Elyse Kharbanda, government director of analysis on the Minnesota-based HealthPartners Institute. “If we noticed a distinction in charges following vaccination versus with out vaccination, that will be what we name a sign and wish extra investigation. However larger research which were carried out extra vigorously haven’t proven a sign.” These research embody one which she authored, which was revealed within the Journal of the American Medical Affiliation in 2021 and located that COVID-19 vaccine publicity didn’t improve the chances of spontaneous abortion — being pregnant loss earlier than 20 weeks. Consultants and well being officers say there isn’t any medical proof that the antagonistic occasions reported to Pfizer are linked to the vaccine, and the vaccine is protected and efficient for pregnant ladies and fetuses. Representatives for Pfizer mentioned the corporate does not touch upon unverified experiences.

— Related Press author Sophia Tulp in Atlanta contributed this report.


Tweet distorts well being look after trans youngsters

CLAIM: Transgender youngsters as younger as 5 years outdated are being given hormones to transition.

THE FACTS: Consultants say younger transgender youngsters who haven’t reached puberty are supplied help, not medical interventions. However a extensively shared tweet urged that 5-year-olds are receiving hormone therapies, likening it to youngsters driving vehicles or smoking. “‘Can I drive your automobile.’ No you’re 5 ‘Can I’ve a beer?’ No you’re 5 ‘Can I’ve a cigarette?’ No you’re 5,” the tweet reads. “‘Can I take hormones and alter my gender?’ After all! You already know what’s finest.” Consultants say that’s a giant distortion of requirements of look after transgender youth. Medical interventions for transgender youth, together with puberty blockers and hormones, aren’t designed to start earlier than the onset of puberty, as steering from teams such because the World Skilled Affiliation for Transgender Well being and American Academy of Pediatrics exhibits. “Youngsters age 5 are far-off from puberty,” mentioned Kellan Baker, government director of the Whitman-Walker Institute in Washington, D.C., which focuses on LGBTQ well being care and analysis. “The first intervention for kids of that age is help — being instructed by mother and father, households, mates, friends, that it’s OK to be who they’re and to not be teased, bullied or subjected to coercive ‘remedy’ to attempt to change one thing that’s innate as gender identification.” Equally, Dr. Elyse Pine, a pediatric endocrinologist at Chase Brexton Well being Care in Baltimore, mentioned in an electronic mail {that a} 5-year-old transgender youngster might even see a psychological well being supplier who may help social and emotional wants and supply instructional supplies or referrals to help teams. “A five-year-old might socially transition, which suggests carrying garments, having a coiffure, and utilizing a reputation/pronoun that matches the kid’s identification,” Pine mentioned. When youngsters do present early indicators of puberty, youngsters who meet scientific pointers are first supplied treatment that briefly blocks puberty, the AP has reported. This remedy is designed for youth recognized with “gender dysphoria” — or misery prompted when gender identification doesn’t match an individual’s assigned intercourse — who’ve been recommended with their households and are mature sufficient to know what the routine entails. After puberty blockers, youngsters can both undergo puberty whereas nonetheless figuring out as the alternative intercourse or select whether or not to start remedy to make their our bodies extra carefully match their gender identification. For these selecting the second possibility, pointers say the following step is taking manufactured variations of estrogen or testosterone — hormones that immediate sexual growth in puberty. Pointers suggest beginning these when youngsters are mature sufficient to make knowledgeable medical selections. That’s sometimes round age 16, and oldsters’ consent is usually required, Dr. Gina Sequiera, co-director of Seattle Youngsters’s Hospital’s Gender Clinic, beforehand instructed the AP. “Masculinizing or feminizing hormones will not be applicable in a five-year-old, as a result of five-year-old youngsters will not be purported to be in puberty,” Pine mentioned. “If a 16-year-old particular person is able to take gender affirming hormone remedy, akin to estrogen or testosterone, they are going to be concordant with their friends, who’re almost all experiencing pubertal hormones.”


Posts about excessive fuel costs falsely attributed to BP government

CLAIM: An government with the vitality firm BP named Brice Cromwell wrote a publish arguing that top fuel costs in the united statesare as a consequence of extreme imports of overseas oil and inadequate home oil manufacturing.

THE FACTS: There isn’t a such government at BP and the assertion didn’t come from the corporate, a spokesperson for BP confirmed. Posts copying and pasting a press release attributed to a “BP Oil Government” named “Brice Cromwell,” and claiming that top fuel costs are brought on by an overreliance on overseas oil, have circulated extensively on social media in current days. “The costs are excessive as a result of the individuals who run our nation have determined to import oil from one other nation as an alternative of utilizing our very personal American made product,” the supposed assertion reads. However no person named Brice Cromwell works for BP and the publish will not be from the corporate, a spokesperson instructed the AP. “We will verify we don’t presently have an worker with that title and this textual content didn’t come from bp,” Megan Baldino, a spokesperson for BP, wrote in an electronic mail. It’s unclear who wrote the unique textual content. Searches present it appeared in Fb posts as early as March, however the variations at the moment weren’t attributed to an creator. Consultants argue that hovering fuel costs are as a consequence of numerous elements within the international vitality market, akin to Russia’s invasion of Ukraine in February. Jonathan Elkind, a fellow and senior analysis scholar at Columbia College’s Heart on International Power Coverage, described the idea that U.S. fuel costs are excessive as a consequence of reliance on overseas oil imports as “economically illiterate.” “The notion that we’re producing too little, exporting too little, importing an excessive amount of, et cetera, is simply all mistaken on its face,” he mentioned. “From one month to the following, the USA on this interval is both the primary or quantity two producer of crude oil and pure fuel on the earth.” The current spike in fuel costs stems from “resurgent demand” as the consequences of the COVID-19 pandemic ebbed, which was made worse by Russia’s invasion of Ukraine, Joshua Busby, an affiliate professor of public affairs on the College of Texas at Austin, wrote in an electronic mail to the AP. “European nations are beginning to delink from importing Russian oil, which implies that the obtainable pool of oil is diminished for them, placing strain on oil costs in the remainder of the world,” Busby wrote. European Union leaders agreed on Might 30 to ban most Russian oil imports by the top of the yr, the AP reported.

— Related Press author Josh Kelety in Phoenix contributed this report


Discover AP Truth Checks right here:


Comply with @APFactCheck on Twitter:

Supply hyperlink

Leave a Comment